Make Review | What It Does, Pricing, Alternatives, My Verdict
AUTOMATION · TOOL REVIEW

Make

★★★★

More capable and far cheaper than Zapier at volume. Worth the extra hour of learning.

CATEGORY
Automation platform
PRICE
Free / Paid
MY RATING
4.5 / 5
LINK TYPE
Affiliate
BEST FOR
Automation at volume, and workflows with real branching

What it is

Make, formerly Integromat, is a visual automation platform where you build workflows as a diagram of connected modules rather than a linear list of steps.

That visual model handles branching, iteration and error handling far better than Zapier's, and its pricing per operation is substantially lower.

It is what I use for anything that runs more than a few times a day.

What it does

Scenario building on a canvas where you can see the whole flow, branch it, loop over arrays and route data conditionally.

Data handling is genuinely better: iterators, aggregators and array functions mean you can process a list of records in one run rather than triggering repeatedly.

Error handling with retry paths and fallbacks, which matters when an automation is doing something you depend on.

Scheduling controls let you run scenarios on intervals or at specific times rather than only on triggers.

Who it's for

01Businesses running automations frequently.
02Anyone whose workflow needs branching or loops.
03Teams processing lists or batches of records.
04People who found Zapier's task costs unsustainable.
05Anybody comfortable spending an hour learning a visual builder.

Features

Visual scenario builder
See and branch the whole workflow on a canvas.
Iterators and aggregators
Process lists properly in a single run.
Error handling
Retry paths and fallbacks for reliability.
Scheduling
Run on intervals or at set times.
Large integration library
Slightly smaller than Zapier's, still extensive.
Operation-based pricing
Considerably cheaper at volume.

Pros and cons

PROS
Far cheaper than Zapier at volume.
Visual builder handles complexity properly.
Excellent data and array handling.
Real error handling and retries.
Generous free tier for testing.
CONS
Steeper learning curve than Zapier.
Slightly fewer integrations.
Canvas becomes cluttered on large scenarios.
Documentation less approachable than Zapier's.
Debugging complex scenarios takes patience.

Pricing

PLAN WHAT YOU GET WORTH IT FOR
Free Monthly operations and two active scenarios. Testing and light use.
Core More operations, unlimited scenarios. Most small businesses.
Pro Higher volume, priority execution, custom variables. Regular heavy use.
Teams and Enterprise Collaboration and admin controls. Larger organisations.

Priced by operations per month, and typically a fraction of Zapier's cost for the same work. The free tier is generous enough for real automations.

MY RECOMMENDED PLAN

The free tier to build your first two scenarios, then Core. Migrate your highest-frequency Zapier automations here first, because that is where the saving is.

Alternatives

Zapier
Easier to learn and more integrations, considerably more expensive at volume.
n8n
Cheapest at scale if you can self-host, and more technical.
Native integrations
Always check first.
A developer and a small script
Sometimes cheaper and more reliable for one critical job.

My verdict

Make is the automation platform I default to. It costs a fraction of Zapier per operation, it handles branching and lists properly, and its error handling means an automation you depend on will tell you when it fails.

The cost is an hour of learning. The canvas model is not harder than Zapier's, it is different, and people who bounce off it usually did so in the first twenty minutes.

If you already run automations in Zapier and the bill is growing, move the high-frequency ones here and keep Zapier for whatever niche integration Make lacks. That combination is what most people end up with.

Try Make →

Who should use it

01Businesses running frequent automations.
02Anyone needing branching, loops or batch processing.
03Teams whose Zapier costs are climbing.
04People wanting real error handling.

Who should avoid it

01Anyone who needs one simple automation working in ten minutes.
02Non-technical users who will not invest an hour learning.
03Businesses relying on an integration only Zapier supports.
04Teams with nobody to maintain the scenarios.

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through one, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you, and it never changes the price you pay. It also does not decide what appears on this page: I recommend tools with no affiliate programme just as readily, and leave off tools with generous ones when they do not deserve the space.

All recommended tools Last reviewed September 2026