Most content strategies I am shown are a list of keywords with a publishing schedule attached.
That was never a strategy, and it works considerably less well now that a large share of informational queries never produce a click.
What replaces it is not more complicated. It is a smaller number of substantial pages, organised around situations rather than phrases, structured so every section can be lifted as an answer, and maintained rather than accumulated.
This is the strategy I build for clients now, in the order I build it.
Quick Info
Start From What You Sell
Not from keyword volume. From the two or three things the business actually makes money from.
Every substantial content piece should connect to one of them, either directly or by establishing the expertise that makes buying from you sensible. If a topic cannot be traced to something you sell, it goes on a maybe list and usually never gets written.
Traffic that cannot buy anything is a hobby.
This single filter removes about two thirds of most content plans, which is the point. What remains is smaller and worth doing properly.
Organise Around Situations, Not Keywords
A keyword is a phrase. A situation is a person with a problem and a set of constraints, and it is the unit that both readers and AI systems respond to.
So for each thing you sell, list the situations that lead someone to need it. For a web design business that might be: launching a first business, replacing a site that embarrasses them, a site that does not convert, a site that got slow, migrating off a platform they have outgrown.
Each situation generates eight to twelve real sub-questions. Those become the sections of one substantial page rather than twelve thin ones.
How to find the sub-questions:
The Page Structure That Serves Both Surfaces
This is the part that makes one piece of work serve ranking and citation simultaneously.
Test it by deleting everything except one heading and its paragraph. If what remains does not answer something useful, the section is not finished.
How Much to Publish
Less than you think, and here is the reasoning.
The supply of competent, characterless articles is now effectively infinite, so the marginal value of another one is close to zero. What is scarce is content containing something that required doing the work.
My default for a small business is one substantial new piece a fortnight and one existing piece rebuilt a fortnight. Twenty-six new and twenty-six improved a year, which on most sites is more than enough to cover the situations that matter.
If you cannot review a piece properly, do not publish it. Volume beyond your review capacity is the specific pattern that gets sites into trouble.
The Maintenance Half Nobody Budgets For
Content is not an asset you buy once. It has an upkeep bill, and AI surfaces are less forgiving about staleness than classic ranking was.
So half the content budget goes to maintenance from the start. In practice:
Refreshing a page that already has some authority returns more per hour than writing a new one from nothing. My content decay article has the full process.
Building Authority on One Topic at a Time
Breadth is the most common strategic error. A site covering forty subjects competently is weaker on every one of them than a site covering four thoroughly.
So sequence it. Pick the situation closest to what you sell, cover it completely across a pillar page and its supporting pieces, interlink them properly, and only then move to the next.
Six months on one topic cluster produces visible results. Six months spread across six topics usually does not, and the work is identical in quantity.
More on the mechanics in my topical authority piece.
What to Measure
Click volume alone will mislead you now, so measure four things.
That last one is manual and it is the closest thing to ground truth available. An hour a quarter.
The Plan on One Page
If you want the whole strategy compressed:
Pick the two or three things you sell. List the situations that lead to them. Find the sub-questions per situation. Build one substantial, answer-first page per situation with something original in it. Cover one cluster completely before starting the next. Spend half the budget maintaining what exists. Measure enquiries and citations, not sessions.
That fits on an index card and it is more of a strategy than most keyword spreadsheets.
Frequently Asked Questions
The topic selection and page structure change more than the strategy does. Situations replace keywords, sections must stand alone as answers, and maintenance takes a bigger share of the budget.
One substantial piece a fortnight plus one rebuilt piece a fortnight suits most small businesses. Never more than you can review properly.
No. A well-structured page serves ranking and citation at once. Splitting the effort doubles the cost for no benefit.
Ask an AI assistant the big question and read what it chose to cover, filter Search Console for question queries, and use the questions from your own enquiry calls.
About half. Refreshing a page with existing authority returns more per hour than writing a new one from nothing.
High-intent clicks and enquiries, branded search and direct traffic, AI surface impressions by page, and manual quarterly citation checks.
Before You Go
The shift is from producing content to covering situations. Fewer pages, more thoroughly, maintained rather than accumulated.
My strategy template, the situation worksheet and the quarterly citation check sheet are in the resources section.
If you want a content strategy built this way for your business, get in touch.
Cover situations, not keywords, Tariq
I'm a marketing consultant, entrepreneur and content creator. I help businesses grow through practical marketing, websites, SEO, content and AI.
More About Tariq →